I have been attempting to stay away from anything political lately, but this thought shot through my cranium on the way to work: Chem weapons, if developed properly, are much more efficient and less destructive than conventional bombs and bullets. Plus, they are actually “Green Warfare.” It takes a lot less fossil fuels to rebuild after a chem attack than a regular or “smart bomb” raid.
I would think chemical weapons would be the weapon of choice in a civil war.
Just a tid-bit of information we are not hearing much about from Syria: There are two major gas pipelines that both Russia and ourselves are deeply interested in. Makes you go HMMM?
theconservativehillbilly 
Sep 11, 2013 @ 09:28:21
If the pipelines go through the stan countries to Russia’s south it has no control. If it goes through Syria it does . Matter of price regulation get more $ from western Europe.
Sep 11, 2013 @ 09:30:36
Think there are some businesses involved too. Carl, give me some time to dig around and find some hard facts. Heck, soft facts might work also:)